A new career pathway for midwives?

As more midwives take up the option of obtaining notation as Medicare-eligible, we are witnessing a series of changes in the career aspirations and practice choices that midwives make.
The ranks of the private branch of the midwifery profession have in the past year been swelled by a new group of midwives who have great hopes for a new career pathway. Many of these newly private midwives have come out of relatively senior positions in hospital employment, chosen a name for their new business, hung up a shingle (published a web page), and distributed pamphlets and business cards promoting their private midwifery care. There is new energy and enthusiasm as they spread the word that it’s a good idea for every woman to consider who will be attending her at the time when she labours and gives birth.

Judging by advertised courses and workshops, the new midwifery career pathway is a growth area for education providers and related services, including insurers.

 The newly self-employed midwife has plans to apply for clinical privileges in local hospitals when that option becomes a reality. In the mean-time, some have negotiated casual employment in hospital maternity units, so that they can provide personal labour and birth care for the women who have employed them privately in the antenatal period, and for whom they will provide private services postnatally.

The new private midwife may not use the title ‘independent’ - a problematic adjective in the world of politically correctness. The newcomer to the ranks of private practice is, in the world of new midwifery, a ‘team player’, who, in theory at least, acts in every situation within collaborative arrangements with the ‘team-leader’, the obstetrician, of course—not the woman!

The old-style ‘independent’ midwife, who has learnt autonomy and independence in practice and in decision-making from experience as the responsible primary maternity care provider for an individual woman, knows the value of working quietly and without fuss, in harmony with natural physiological processes, and enabling ordinary women to access their extraordinary strength and health in giving birth and caring for their babies.

APMA has received information from midwives who are at different places on the private practice spectrum: from those who have ceased midwifery practice since the maternity reforms were introduced; those who are under investigation by the regulatory authority; those who have invested their life savings into establishing and maintaining practices, rooms, and services; and those who work as solo midwife for births in homes that are scattered over vast distances. There is a big question mark over the future for private midwifery homebirth attendance, with the exemption from professional indemnity insurance for homebirth being limited to June 2013.

Although ‘new’ private midwives have invested time and money and a great deal of effort in achieving notation as Medicare-eligible, purchasing expensive indemnity insurance, and setting up their practices, with the hope of being able to provide expert continuity of care for women who give birth in hospitals where they (the midwives) have been awarded clinical privileges, there is little evidence in most of the country of progress on the part of hospitals—public or private— being eager to open up such options.

Maternity service provision must be based on the fact that professional care from a midwife is essential, not optional, for all pregnant women and their babies. When the current plan for maternity reform was being developed, midwives were told “Unless and until the Government is shocked and shamed into realising that Australian women are now scrambling to find the birthing centre of their choice, and in some cases scrambling to find any professional who will deliver their child, the situation will not improve." (J Gillard 2005)

Joy Johnston

Thankyou for your comments.

Assessing progress with Medicare

Let's review and assess private practice midwives and Medicare!

In the past year midwives who have the 'eligible' notation against their name on the Midwives Register have been able, in theory at least, to facilitate Medicare rebates to women in their care. The common process is that the receipt issued by the midwife contains the midwife's Medicare Provider Number, the name and address of the practice as it is registered with Medicare, and the Medicare Item number(s) for services provided.  The woman/client receives rebate of the scheduled fee plus any addition rebate under the Extended Medicare Safety Net scheme.

The Health Insurance (Midwife and Nurse Practitioner) Determination 2011 - F2011L02162 is the legislation that gives detailed description of the Items and the current level of the scheduled fee for midwifery services, from which rebate is calculated.

Australian Private Midwives' Association (APMA) has asked members to provide information about how they are traveling in the new 'Medicare eligibility' terrain. Understandably, much of the response has focused on the requirements of the new legislation for a collaborative agreement or arrangement with a named, specified obstetric medical practitioner - all of which is defined and directed in the law. The midwife is required to demonstrate and record suitable collaboration in order for Medicare rebates to be available to the woman, but there is no linked requirement, or even encouragement, for any doctor to reciprocate when collaboration is requested.

Some midwives are situated in communities where doctors and even public hospitals are willing to enter collaborative arrangements with private midwives. The midwives are getting on with the job of being with woman; the women are receiving expert midwifery care from their own midwives through the continuum, as promised by the Health Minister when the maternity reform package was announced, and receiving significant Medicare rebates for the midwifery services.

However, midwives practising privately in other communities, such as densely populated big cities, or covering rural towns and villages, face multiple challenges each time they attempt to comply with the collaboration law. Here are a few quotes from midwives' responses.

[The collaboration requirements are]

"absolutely unreasonable. We are qualified competent midwives who should not be held to ransom by our medical colleagues. It is mainly unworkable and my clients are having to travel all over the place to get an agreement and they pay a new patient fee and then are told ‘oh no I’m not doing that now’ even though the doctor signed an agreement with another client the week before. It’s not fair on the doctor either as they often don’t understand they are not required to do anything and if there are any deviations from normal then we consult directly with the [backup] hospital. Doctors often say there’s no point to this because we’re doing the same thing and doubling up and it’s not required for a healthy uncomplicated pregnant women. I say "I KNOW, but can you just sign anyway" because it’s just a formality and a requirement until we get the legislation changed!!"

[The collaboration requirements]

"should not have such and emphasis on the midwife being subservient to the doctor. It should also provide an incentive for a doctor to want to collaborate with us!"

[The collaboration requirements]

"are not necessary - we had the same system of referral and transfer here before Medicare and it worked fine but it was not formalised. Now it takes extra time and the doctor has the power to veto - this is not acceptable."

Collaboration can be a relatively simple matter.  A letter of referral (one of the processes by which collaboration is demonstrated) from a doctor Melbourne, who had not previously met this woman, wrote to the midwife:

"Thanks for caring for <M>  for the antenatal and postnatal period of her pregnancy.  She is well.  I am happy to provide collaborative care."   

On the other hand, an obstetrician, who is a senior consultant at a public maternity hospital has said:

"I am not comfortable with this model of care (ie private midwife).  If <M> wants a private midwife she will need to make a booking at [public] hospital, and have all her care under that system.  Any additional care she wants from a private midwife will be at her own cost.  I will not sign a collaborative arrangement."

The midwife, and the woman, must return to the drawing board, seeking a way to meet the collaboration requirements.


Readers are welcome to make their own assessment of progress in the midwife-Medicare labour.
Midwives assess progress (of this labour) externally, and the external features that can be noted include the fact that some women are claiming rebate on midwives' fees.  The amount of this rebate could be up to $1000 per woman/episode of care.

Midwives also assess progress internally, and the internal signs of the Medicare labour are not good.  The efforts made by some obstetricians to isolate and exclude private midwifery, blocking what little financial assistance the woman is entitled to, will lead to distress and obstruction.  The people who will suffer most are the mother and her baby.


Thankyou for your comments.